Advertisement
There is a lot of different information out there regarding romantic compatibility between types. Among others, I know of the following theories of perfect matches:
- Opposites attract (INTJ + ESFP, ISTP + ENFJ etc.)
- Keirsey: Opposites attract, but N or S must be the same (INTJ + ENFP, ISTP + ESFJ etc.)
- Personalitypage: The dominant function must be shared, but oppositely directed (INTJ with Introverted Intuition + ENFP _or_ ENTP since both have Extraverted Intuition, ISTP with Introverted Thinking + ESTJ _or_ ENTJ since both have Extraverted Thinking)
Based on my own observations, I believe that Keirsey has it right when he insists that N or S should be the same. I also believe that Personalitypage is correct in emphasizing the importance of having the same dominant function. Finally, I believe that, as long as the basic language (N or S) and interest (dominant function) are the same, opposites do indeed attract and complement one another.
I therefore propose the following hierarchy of relationship matches:
---
Condition 1: The dominant function must be the same, but oppositely directed.
Condition 2: The perceiving function (N or S) must be the same.
If possible once these conditions are met, the judging function (T or F) should be different.
---
This leads to the following eight optimal matches:
INTJ-ENFP (Dominant function: Intuition, T and F opposite)
ENTP-INFJ (Dominant function: Intuition, T and F opposite)
ISTJ-ESFP (Dominant function: Sensing, T and F opposite)
ESTP-ISFJ (Dominant function: Sensing, T and F opposite)
INTP-ENTJ (Dominant function: Thinking)
ISTP-ESTJ (Dominant function: Thinking)
ENFJ-INFP (Dominant function: Feeling)
ESFJ-ISFP (Dominant function: Feeling)
---
I'd love to hear any thoughtful comments.
Also, if anyone is aware of a source who has already published this hierarchy, please let me know.
Yours,
Tanja (INTJ)
- Opposites attract (INTJ + ESFP, ISTP + ENFJ etc.)
- Keirsey: Opposites attract, but N or S must be the same (INTJ + ENFP, ISTP + ESFJ etc.)
- Personalitypage: The dominant function must be shared, but oppositely directed (INTJ with Introverted Intuition + ENFP _or_ ENTP since both have Extraverted Intuition, ISTP with Introverted Thinking + ESTJ _or_ ENTJ since both have Extraverted Thinking)
Based on my own observations, I believe that Keirsey has it right when he insists that N or S should be the same. I also believe that Personalitypage is correct in emphasizing the importance of having the same dominant function. Finally, I believe that, as long as the basic language (N or S) and interest (dominant function) are the same, opposites do indeed attract and complement one another.
I therefore propose the following hierarchy of relationship matches:
---
Condition 1: The dominant function must be the same, but oppositely directed.
Condition 2: The perceiving function (N or S) must be the same.
If possible once these conditions are met, the judging function (T or F) should be different.
---
This leads to the following eight optimal matches:
INTJ-ENFP (Dominant function: Intuition, T and F opposite)
ENTP-INFJ (Dominant function: Intuition, T and F opposite)
ISTJ-ESFP (Dominant function: Sensing, T and F opposite)
ESTP-ISFJ (Dominant function: Sensing, T and F opposite)
INTP-ENTJ (Dominant function: Thinking)
ISTP-ESTJ (Dominant function: Thinking)
ENFJ-INFP (Dominant function: Feeling)
ESFJ-ISFP (Dominant function: Feeling)
---
I'd love to hear any thoughtful comments.
Also, if anyone is aware of a source who has already published this hierarchy, please let me know.
Yours,
Tanja (INTJ)
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Hierarchy of conditions for perfect matches
Tue, April 3, 2007 - 6:04 PMI don't know about this at all, but it is fascinating.
I must say, what if we just went with the old fashion "wink & a smile"? -
-
Re: Hierarchy of conditions for perfect matches
Sun, July 15, 2007 - 8:38 PMTanja I mostly agree with your theory. What I would say is personalities get along best when they don't have opposing dominant functions, eg ENFJ & INTP or ISTP.
Example: An INTJ and ENFJ have better chances of getting along than and ENFJ and INTP because their functions don't antagonize each other. When someone's dominant function is your weakest that creates many problems. I think having at least two functions in common that don't repel each other should be alright. -
-
Re: Hierarchy of conditions for perfect matches
Thu, October 11, 2007 - 8:55 AMI would agree with this being an INTP happily married to a ENFJ for 16 years.
-
-
-
Re: Hierarchy of conditions for perfect matches
Sun, September 30, 2007 - 6:46 PMYou might be interested in an online dating site called TypeTango: www.typetango.com which uses the personality theory developed by Carl Jung, Katharine Briggs, Isabel Myers, David Keirsey and others to help you find people with whom you are statistically more likely to get along.